IOI 2004 Competition Survey |
Contestant | Delegation Leader | 76 | Blank |
Windows editors Linux editors
C C++ Pascal rhide 7.8% 11.84% 5.2% emacs 2.63% 4% Free Pascal IDE 23.68% other 1.3% 7.89% 7.89%
C C++ Pascal rhide 2.6% 2.6% 1.3% emacs 3.94% xemacs 1.3% vi 10.52% 6.5% 1.3% joe other 2.6%
Windows debuggers Linux debuggers
C C++ Pascal rhide 5.57% 10.52% 3.94% gdb 1.3% 3.94% 3.94% Free Pascal IDE 21%
C C++ Pascal rhide 2.6% 1.3% gdb 9.21% 10.52% 1.3% ddd 1.3% 2.6%
Do you think it is useful to allow contestants to bring in: |
|
||||||||||||||||
Did you bring in: |
|
One idea for the future is to run only linux in the competition,
and provide a bootable CD-ROM with documentation for contestants to use for training. |
Yes | No | Blank |
---|---|---|---|
Would you be satisfied using Linux if rhide and the Free Pascal IDE are provided? | 61.84% | 27.63% | 10.53% |
Would you be satisfied using Linux with standard Linux editors (and no IDEs)? | 30.26% | 53.95% | 15.79% |
Another idea for the future is to allow submissions in Java. |
Yes | No | Blank |
Would you use Java if it were provided? | 31.58% |
50% |
18.42% |
Would you need a Java IDE? | 26.31% |
44.74% |
28.95% |
Even if you did not use Java, would you support making it available to others? | 67.10% | 14.47% | 18.43% |
Would it be acceptable to have different time limits for JAVA? | 34.21% | 51.32% | 14.47% |
Would it be acceptable to have different time limits for each programming language | 30.26% | 55.26% | 14.48% |
Was it useful to have available on the competition server web page: |
Yes | No | Blank |
IOI documents | 82.90% | 3.94% | 13.16% |
Manuals on tools (e.g. rhide) | 81.60% | 2.6% | 15.80% |
Programming language references | 60.53% | 39.47% |
What other tools would you like to have available?
[Feedback omitted.]
Giving information about limits on 50% of test cases | Yes | No | Blank |
Did it help you? | 59.21% | 11.84% | 28.95% |
Is it a good idea in general? | 80.26% | 10.53% | 9.21% |
Please give any other feedback about the environment.
[Feedback omitted.]
Understandability
|
Difficulty
|
Enjoyable?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hermes |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Artemis |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Polygon |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Empodia |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Farmer |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Phidias |
|
|
|
Which task did you like most?
18.4% Hermes |
6.58% Artemis |
14.49% Polygon |
35.52% Empodia |
5.26% Farmer |
5.26% Phidias |
14.49% Blank |
Which task did you like least?
1.3% Hermes |
5.26% Artemis |
40.79% Polygon |
3.95% Empodia |
27.63% Farmer |
6.58% Phidias |
14.49% Blank |
Usability
|
Functionality
|
Responsiveness
|
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Submission |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Test Runs |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Printing |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Backup/Restore |
|
|
6.57% 10.52% 6.57% 1.35% 2.63% 72.36% | ||||||||||||||||||
Analysis Mode |
|
|
|
Presentation
|
Content
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Printed score sheets |
|
|
||||||||||||
Online grading results |
|
|
Yes | No | Blank | |
---|---|---|---|
Did you use analysis mode? | 30.26% | 15.8% | 53.94% |
Was analysis mode helpful to you? | 32.89% | 3.95% | 63.16% |
Should analysis mode have additional features? (If so, what?)
[Feedback omitted.]
Please give any other feedback about the grading system.
[Feedback omitted.]