IOI 2004 Competition Survey |
Contestant | 199 | Delegation Leader? | Blank |
Windows editors Linux editors
C C++ Pascal rhide 9.54% 28.14% 1% emacs 1% 1% Free Pascal IDE 38.69% other 3% 3.51%
C C++ Pascal rhide 3% 6% 2.51% emacs 2% 12% 2% xemacs 4.52% 1% vi 8% 8.54% 3.51% joe 1% other 1% 14% 6.53%
Windows debuggers Linux debuggers
C C++ Pascal rhide 7.53% 22.61% 2% gdb 1% 3% 5.52% Free Pascal IDE 32.16%
C C++ Pascal rhide 4.52% 5.52% 4% gdb 7.53% 11.56% 2% ddd 3% 1%
Do you think it is useful to allow contestants to bring in: |
|
||||||||||||||||
Did you bring in: |
|
One idea for the future is to run only linux in the competition,
and provide a bootable CD-ROM with documentation for contestants to use for training. |
Yes | No | Blank |
---|---|---|---|
Would you be satisfied using Linux if rhide and the Free Pascal IDE are provided? | 66.83% | 31.66% | 1.51% |
Would you be satisfied using Linux with standard Linux editors (and no IDEs)? | 41.70% | 54.77% | 3.53% |
Another idea for the future is to allow submissions in Java. |
Yes | No | Blank |
Would you use Java if it were provided? | 16.58% |
82.91% |
0.51% |
Would you need a Java IDE? | 19.09% |
71.86% |
9.05% |
Even if you did not use Java, would you support making it available to others? | 65.82% | 31.16% | 3.02% |
Would it be acceptable to have different time limits for JAVA? | 40.70% | 58.29% | 1.01% |
Would it be acceptable to have different time limits for each programming language | 32.16% | 66.83% | 1.01% |
Was it useful to have available on the competition server web page: |
Yes | No | Blank |
IOI documents | 79.39% | 18.09% | 2.52% |
Manuals on tools (e.g. rhide) | 77.38% | 21.61% | 1.01% |
Programming language references | 75.38% | 4.74% | 19.88% |
What other tools would you like to have available?
[Feedback omitted.]
Giving information about limits on 50% of test cases | Yes | No | Blank |
Did it help you? | 74.37% | 24.62% | 1.01% |
Is it a good idea in general? | 65.83% | 32.16% | 2.01% |
Please give any other feedback about the environment.
[Feedback omitted.]
Understandability
|
Difficulty
|
Enjoyable?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hermes |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Artemis |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Polygon |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Empodia |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Farmer |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Phidias |
|
|
|
Which task did you like most?
13.06% Hermes |
15.58% Artemis |
10.05% Polygon |
23.62% Empodia |
16.58 Farmer |
18.59% Phidias |
2.52% Blank |
Which task did you like least?
4.02% Hermes |
5.54% Artemis |
61.80% Polygon |
7.03% Empodia |
8.04% Farmer |
10.55% Phidias |
3.02% Blank |
Usability
|
Functionality
|
Responsiveness
|
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Submission |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Test Runs |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Printing |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Backup/Restore |
|
|
37.18% 23.62% 14.07% 1.01% 1.01% 23.11% | ||||||||||||||||||
Analysis Mode |
|
|
|
Presentation
|
Content
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Printed score sheets |
|
|
||||||||||||
Online grading results |
|
|
Yes | No | Blank | |
---|---|---|---|
Did you use analysis mode? | 51.26% | 44.72% | 4.02% |
Was analysis mode helpful to you? | 47.73% | 40.2% | 12.06% |
Should analysis mode have additional features? (If so, what?)
[Feedback omitted.]
Please give any other feedback about the grading system.
[Feedback omitted.]